---  
title
Conejo al ajillo, peruana y desolación. 2004
production
No pasarán Films
director
Pablo Valiente
format
MiniDV for copy on 35mm KodakVision
screen ratio
1:1.85
post-production
MadridFilm / La luna Digital
 
 
---  
profile:
launch

press info:
Panasonic MiniDV AG-DVX100 Camera Test

 
 
---  
Panasonic MiniDV AG-DVX100 Camera Test
Alfonso Parra
published
alfonsoparra.com
date
september 2004
   
   
---  
 

In preparation for the shooting of Pablo Valiente’s short film we have done a series of tests with the Panasonic’s Ag-DVX100 MiniDV camera in co-operation with InfoTv, Madrid Film and Liquid Productions. The MiniDV format was chosen due to its reduced cost and the fact that it was the most adequate to represent the script.

The test was done at the InfoTV facilities using the following equipment
Panasonic Ag-DVX100 25P Camera 1/25 Cine-Like scene
Wave Monitor/Vectoscope
Sony 9” Monitor
ESSER TEST CHARTS TE 105 TE 125 TE 166 TE 222 TE 223 TE 106 (Some cards are transparencies lit by an LV5 spherical format)
Filmed with Arrilaser on KodaK 5242 intermediate and printed on KodaK Vision

Within the miniDV format, the DVX100 stands out thanks to its high quality and specially its 25P feature, with real progressive scan, as well as to the possibility of adjusting gamma, colour, detail and many other factors that make this camera an excellent tool for certain types of cinematographic work.

What follows are in-depth analyses of the cameras features.

Latitude:
In order to compare the camera’s latitude in both the cine-like and the default settings, we overexposed and underexposed on an 18% grey card.




In * (Fig.1), we can see the characteristic X-shaped wave that is formed where the blacks are higher than usual. We can see that the signal in the normal system is more compressed * (Fig.2), the blacks are darker and with less detail although in the area of whites we can see how the higher values are lower than those in the cinelike curve; this curve captures more detail in the shadows and mid-tones at the expense of losing some detail in the high lights as we can see when we compare the two gamma curves, resulting in a generally softer picture.

* (Fig.1)

* (Fig.1)


* (Fig.2)
Comparison between Normal(Pal) and Cine-Like


In the comparison between normal gamma curves and cine-like we can see how with the same input signal (see the high light values), the cine-like outputs a lower signal than normal, which implies more detail in the shadows and mid-tones as well as in the high lights, being incapable of reproducing the information under extremely high light, whereas the normal curve can still handle it.






The footage in intermediate can be seen in * (Fig. 3) as well as the print.

* (Fig.3)


* (Fig.3)

Greys shot on intermediate and printed at 32-36-19


We can conclude that with the cine-like feature the camera maintains a latitude slightly over 5 F-stops, 3 F-stops under the median grey and 2 1/3 over, which is enough for this format while being far from the latitude attained by other video formats, such as HDCam, which reach up to 9 F-stops, and of course film negative which reaches up to 11 F-stops. In view of these results it is necessary to light very carefully to ensure that everything in the shot lies within the range that the camera can reproduce correctly. For the short film we had to choose very carefully the actors’ wardrobe so there were never in the same shot actors with contrasting clothes, and the set walls have had to be painted darker than usual. Another aspect to take into account has been the treatment given to skin tones, as we had to constantly touch-up the actors’ make-up to avoid that the reflection from their faces, falling outside the camera’s latitude range, was reproduced as burnt-out spots. Using the cine-like set-up clearly makes the original image smoother than normal and it therefore requires a colour grading process that adjusts the blacks, the whites and the gamma in general.


Seq. 2 shot 2 T :4 Lens: 32mm (relative to 35mm) Filter ND3


In the image we can see the range of latitude, controlled in this case by lighting the shadows and the choices made during the shoot.
The camera's sensitivity using the cine-like setting with a 1/25 shutter speed is around 500 Asa, and 300 Asa at 1/50.




In the previous table we could observe how the luminosity and the V response is very similar with very wide apertures, which made me decide to work on 3.4 throughout the majority of the film. In the grey scale we can notice this, with the card's luminosity remains almost identical all the way until Open (1.6). For that reason the optimal highest aperture is 2.8 and the lowest one is 16



Sharpness
One of the most significant improvements in terms of image sharpness has been the camera's ability to shooting with a real progressive scan, thanks to which we can really see the camera's 440.000 pixels of resolution. In the following cards we can see the camera's definition, which, despite being far from professional format performance, is very good for its range, making it possible to consider transferring the image to 35mm as long as one is aware of the existing limitations.

Resolution card in Cine-Like mode


In the following images we compare the camera's definition with that of a professional format to illustrate the importance of definition in the quality of the final projected image. It is of utmost importance to choose the format on the basis of the story being told, and although this camera is perfect for the work we Pablo Valiente's project, it might not reach the necessary standard for other kinds of productions, despite whatever some producers might suggest, based on economic considerations rather than artistic decisions. The camera's definition makes the use of this camera recommended for very specific work if it is going to be for shown in big screens. In our case, and given the film's story we decided that the look of the film required a certain "roughness" provided by this slight loss of sharpness.



Notice the difference in resolution in the edges of the image as well as the centre




Comparison between HD resolution and MiniDV, with a 300% zoom.


Colour
Another camera feature worth mentioning is how it transforms the colour towards tones closer to emulsions than to video. In FIG 7 we can see the difference in colour between normal settings and the cine-like feature, the latter having the reds slightly corrected using the phase so they did not tend so much towards magenta.


Macbeth card in Cine Like and Pal Normal formats. Notice the difference in saturation as well as the difference in the tones, specially in the reds


The final look has a more natural colour, less shrill than that of normal video. In the images we can see the differences in colour and the results after colour-grading. It should be noted that the camera in preset 3200 gives an excessive red dominance that can be easily corrected during colour-grading.


Original frame


Colour-graded frame. Notice the original deviations towards red as well as the smoothness of the image.


Resolution comparison between colour HD and MiniDV



Colour resolution close-up


Seq.4 shot 1 T: 3.4 Focal 32mm(correspondencia con 35mm) 1/25

Lens:

An excellent Leica Dicomar lens without noticeable anomalies, if anything a very slight decrease in light uniformity with apertures under 2.8. Absence of geometric distortions in either the widest angle or the longest tele. The lens has excellent and great sharpness without noticeable chromatic anomalies. Other considerations:

The camera makes it possible to modify many parameters that affect the image. To attain a more professional level, the camera would need a few improvements, such as adding marks to the focus ring (instead of the no-end-stop) and a remote focus control. In addition, the diaphragm adjustment has to be done in half F-stop units, which is not very comfortable. Another inconvenient was the RECORTE that both the view-finder and the LCD screen DO on the sides of the frame, hiding considerable amounts of the image on both the left and the right sides. This problem can be solved taking a monitor with underscan on-set, but we didn’t always have that chance. Access to the menus was quite simple and comfortable. The menu allows us to slightly modify the levels of detail, chroma and the phase amongst others.

Conclusion: In my opinion this camera offers a standard of quality high enough to be used in professional projects, with very good results in every aspect, although one should never attempt to use it as a substitute for professional formats. Quoting cinematographer Tamí Reiker “When you shoot in MiniDV instead of asking yourself how you are going to make the images beautiful you have to ask yourself: How am I going to make these images aceptable?"

   
---  
  © alfonsoparra.com · 2006